Advertisement

Opinion | How the arrest of Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou may mark the start of the great China-US technology decoupling

  • Jesse Friedlander says China’s military and technological gains on the US mean that nations globally may soon have to choose between Western and Chinese tech

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
0
Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou exits the court registry following her bail hearing at British Columbia Superior Court in Vancouver on December 11. Huawei, founded in 1987 by a former officer of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, has come under increased scrutiny of late for its relations with the Beijing government. Photo: CTV Television Network/AFP
Huawei’s recent trials and tribulations in the West and the retaliatory actions of China against Canada have shocked many people. It is natural to assume that the detentions and restrictions on Huawei’s use in core infrastructure are due to the rupture in US-China trade relations. However, these actions can best be understood through the prism of two clashing meta-trends: hi-tech’s strategic importance across the realms of defence, commerce and social organisation under the leadership of the United States, and China’s emergence as a rising military power under the auspices of the Communist Party.  

Technology and telecommunications have important characteristics which render them highly strategic, as compared to traditional industries such as steel, manufacturing or petrochemicals. While these basic industries have historically been fundamental to a nation’s economic development and military might, their strategic importance has diminished as their supply chains have become easily replaceable.

A steel company can select from a range of coal and iron suppliers producing more or less the same commodity globally. The same can be said for an automobile company that needs to source steel. Cutting-edge technology products, on the other hand, rely on a highly specialised group of suppliers which design customised products and services.

In addition to having vulnerable supply chains, technology and telecommunications systems bear a higher cost from any sort of disruption as they are typically linked in a network, such that a problem occurring in one part of the chain jeopardises the entire network.

Meanwhile, governments, militaries, companies and individuals are increasingly reliant on technology, which is embedded into every facet of our work and lives. The rise of social media, cyber hacking, artificial intelligence and big data, and the roll-out of the internet of things with 5G all demonstrate the critical nature of our technology and telecoms systems.
Thanks to its world-class research institutes and vibrant start-up ecosystem, the US has fostered virtually every domain of technology, including semi-conductors, supercomputers, enterprise software and advanced telecommunications. The US has also spearheaded the setting of standards governing connectivity between technological layers and devices – including the internet itself – for commercial and other uses. The ability to set protocols means commercial benefits for those companies that are early to adopt and promote the technology, often on a licensing basis. Equally important, and pertinent to geopolitics, the US plays a key role in limiting access to key technologies by regimes not in favour, through various sanctions and export-control regimes.
Advertisement