A pedestrian looks at a stock board in Tokyo on January 4 displaying a graph of the US 10-year Treasury yield. The US government bond market used to be a safe haven for investors. Photo: Bloomberg
A pedestrian looks at a stock board in Tokyo on January 4 displaying a graph of the US 10-year Treasury yield. The US government bond market used to be a safe haven for investors. Photo: Bloomberg
Benjamin J. Cohen
Opinion

Opinion

Macroscope by Benjamin J. Cohen

When even US Treasuries are no longer safe havens, market volatility is here to stay

  • Benjamin J. Cohen says the US government bond market is no longer seen as a safe haven for investors. And nor is the euro zone or the Japanese government bond market, while Chinese securities inspire little confidence either

TOP PICKS

A pedestrian looks at a stock board in Tokyo on January 4 displaying a graph of the US 10-year Treasury yield. The US government bond market used to be a safe haven for investors. Photo: Bloomberg
A pedestrian looks at a stock board in Tokyo on January 4 displaying a graph of the US 10-year Treasury yield. The US government bond market used to be a safe haven for investors. Photo: Bloomberg

With equities slumping, exchange-rate volatility increasing and political risks intensifying, financial markets around the world have hit a rough patch. In times like these, international investors generally grow cautious and prioritise safety over returns, so money flees to safe havens that provide secure, liquid investment-grade assets on a sufficiently large scale. But there are no obvious safe havens today. For the first time in living memory, investors lack a quiet port where they can take shelter from a storm. 

Historically, the safe haven par excellence was the United States, in the form of
Treasury bonds
backed by the “full faith and credit” of the US government. As one investment strategist put it back in 2012, “When people are worried, all roads lead to Treasuries.”
The
bursting of the US housing bubble in 2007
offers a case in point. No one doubted the US was the epicentre of the global financial crisis. But rather than flee the US, capital actually flooded into it. In the last three months of 2008, net purchases of US assets reached US$500 billion.
READ FULL ARTICLE

To be sure, some of the dollar claims were added to portfolios because foreign banks and institutional investors were meeting funding needs with greenbacks, after interbank and other wholesale short-term markets seized up. But that was hardly the only reason why portfolio managers piled into the US. Much of the increased demand was due to sheer fear. At a time when nobody knew how bad things might get, the US was widely seen as the safest bet.

The prototypes for US President Donald Trump's border wall are seen behind the border fence between Mexico and the US. The US government has been shut down by a dispute over funding for the wall. Photo: Reuters
The prototypes for US President Donald Trump's border wall are seen behind the border fence between Mexico and the US. The US government has been shut down by a dispute over funding for the wall. Photo: Reuters
But this was before the arrival of US President Donald Trump, who has managed to undermine confidence in the dollar to an unprecedented degree. In addition to abandoning any notion of fiscal responsibility, Trump has spent his first two years in office
attacking international institutions
and
picking fights with US allies
.

To be sure, even before Trump, confidence in the dollar suffered a blow in 2011, when Standard & Poor’s downgraded the US debt rating by one notch in response to a near-shutdown of the government. That episode was triggered by a stand-off between then president Barack Obama and congressional Republicans over a routine proposal to raise the federal debt ceiling.

Today, investors have even more reason to worry about the US government’s credit rating. In 2018 alone, the US government was
shut down
three times, and it remains in a partial shutdown to this day, owing to Trump’s demand for funds to build a “big, beautiful wall” on the border with Mexico.
Where can investors go if not the US? The
euro zone
might seem like a logical alternative. After the dollar, the euro is the world’s most widely used currency. And, taken together, the capital markets of the 19 euro zone members are close in size to the US market. But Europe has troubles of its own. Economic growth is slowing, not least in Germany, and the risk of a banking crisis looms in Italy, the euro-zone’s third-largest economy.
Worse still is the uncertainty over
Brexit
, which could be highly disruptive if Britain crashes out of the European Union without a divorce agreement. Needless to say, Britain, too, can be ruled out as a safe haven, at least until the Brexit fiasco is resolved.
The European Central Bank has taken control of a troubled Italian bank, Banca Carige. Photo: Reuters
The European Central Bank has taken control of a troubled Italian bank, Banca Carige. Photo: Reuters

What about the Swiss franc? Its attractions are obvious, but Switzerland’s financial markets are simply too small to serve as an adequate substitute for the US.

That leaves Japan. With its abundant supply of government bonds, it is the biggest single market for public debt outside the US. The question for portfolio managers, though, is whether it is really safe to invest in a country where government debt exceeds 230 per cent of GDP.

For comparison, the public debt-to-GDP ratio in the US is around 88 per cent; and even in troubled Italy, it is no more than 130 per cent. Admittedly, the market for Japanese government debt is more stable than most, owing to the fact that much of it is held by
domestic savers
(which is to say, it is safely tucked under the mattress). But Japan is an ageing country with an economy that has remained almost stagnant for a quarter of a century. Investors would be right to wonder where it would find the resources to continue servicing its massive debt.

And then there is China, with the world’s third-largest national market for public debt. Certainly, the supply of assets in China is ample. But the Chinese market is so tightly controlled that it is essentially the opposite of a safe haven. It will be a long time before global investors even consider putting much faith in Chinese securities.

With secure ports becoming scarce, investors will become increasingly jittery. They will be inclined to move funds at the slightest sign of danger, which will add substantially to market volatility. Today’s rough patch is probably here to stay.

Benjamin J. Cohen is professor of international political economy at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the author of Currency Power: Understanding Monetary Rivalry. Copyright:
Project Syndicate
 
This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Obvious safe havens hard to find amid the global volatility