Advertisement
Advertisement
Illustration: Craig Stephens
Opinion
David Zweig
David Zweig

Year of the Pig throwback: how much has changed in China and Hong Kong since 2007?

  • In 2007, Xi Jinping was anointed as China’s future leader and a path to universal suffrage in Hong Kong had opened up. Today, Xi has consolidated power, but China is embroiled in a trade war while Hong Kong’s democracy dreams have been dashed
We have just entered the Year of the Pig, an excellent moment to reflect on where China and Hong Kong were 12 years ago in 2007 – the year last dedicated to the same zodiac animal – and their current circumstances.
Back then, Xi Jinping had just become the Politburo Standing Committee’s sixth-ranking member, implying he would succeed Hu Jintao as China’s pre-eminent leader in 2012. We now know that Xi defeated Li Keqiang in a straw vote by around 400 top leaders in June 2007 to determine the next general secretary of the Communist Party. We didn’t know it then, but Xi Jinping’s “new era” was only five years away.
In 2007, China’s annual gross domestic product growth peaked at 14.2 per cent. And while the global financial crisis was around the corner, the government in Beijing was cash rich, having accumulated vast amounts of capital since the 1994 tax reform, and could introduce a massive stimulus package. China was proud of its response and its role in saving the global economy.
On the eve of the Olympics, Beijing was preparing to welcome the world to a more open China. Foreign journalists would be allowed to travel freely and interview whoever they wanted. But the Chinese state’s focus on security would quickly intensify. The riots in Tibet and Xinjiang in 2008 and 2009, respectively, increased the Communist Party’s concerns about threats from the periphery, so, by 2011, China was spending more money on internal security than on national defence.
Sino-American ties were ticking along. US president George W. Bush had stopped referring to China as a “strategic competitor”. As a result of the attack on the World Trade Centre in 2001, the US, accepting China’s position that it faced an existential threat in Xinjiang, recognised the East Turkestan Islamic Movement as a terrorist group. China was pleased.
US president Barack Obama’s “pivot to Asia”, which the Chinese leadership saw as a clear effort to contain China, had not yet been articulated. Americans were still optimistic that China would become a “responsible stakeholder”, and that China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation would turn the country into a democratic capitalist system.
Hong Kong-mainland relations were upbeat. In 2007, chief executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen convinced the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress to grant Hong Kong “universal suffrage” for the chief executive election in 2017. The only sticking point was how the candidates would be selected.

Time to sit down with Beijing and discuss a vote for all in Hong Kong

As we know, the decision of the NPC Standing Committee on August 31, 2014 – that a China-friendly nomination committee would pick the candidates for the chief executive election, blocking any pan-democrat from competing – would trigger Hong Kong’s worst political crisis since the 1967 riots.

But where are we now as we enter the Year of the Pig in 2019?

In the early 1990s, China introduced a succession system whereby the heir apparent joined the Politburo Standing Committee during the incumbent leader’s 10-year term. The result has been peaceful leadership transitions in 2002 and 2012.

However, in 2018, Xi’s constitutional revision ended presidential term limits, suggesting that he intends to be “leader for life.” Xi’s decision to extend his rule probably reflects his refusal to allow Hu Chunhua, a Hu Jintao protégé, and the leading contender to replace Xi, to come to power in 2022. Xi wants to groom his own successor who will remain loyal to his “Chinese dream” even after he leaves public office. Still, by de-institutionalising a succession process that had worked well, Xi runs the risk of resurrecting elite conflict within China’s political system.

Will China pay too high a price for ending curb on leader’s power?

Today, much discussion focuses on China’s economic problems. Too much money is going to state-owned enterprises compared to the private sector. As half the funds used in 2008 to stimulate China’s economy after the global financial crisis came from local government coffers, the solution to that crisis generated today’s local debt crisis.
With a slowing economy, jobs are harder to find. China’s demographic bombshell – too many old people and not enough young workers – may have begun to drag on the country’s ascendancy. Also, an ageing population will force the state to allocate more funds to health care and a more comprehensive retirement programme.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam briefs Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on December 17, on the latest economic, social and political situation in Hong Kong. Photo: Handout
US-China ties are at a nadir as a rising China challenges a US that refuses to cede global dominance. Decades of “engagement” have turned into a steady stream of “disengagement”. Whether we call it a trade or a tech war, the gloves have come off in this strategic rivalry. Is there a way out?
Hard to say, as the US is demanding that China abandon a developmental strategy, which heretofore has worked quite well, and transform into the country that America hoped China would become when it supported its accession to the WTO. Still, one must hope that US pressures will combine with renewed liberal voices within China to reinvigorate the country’s reform programme.

Inside China: 40 years of economic reform and 'opening up'

Finally, it is now unlikely that Hong Kong will ever become an electoral democracy. That opportunity may have come and gone. Moreover, with so many young Hongkongers preferring greater autonomy, if not independence, after 2047, Beijing has decided that Hong Kong’s threat to China’s national security will take precedence over Hongkongers’ right to protest, and going forward, large-scale civil disobedience will not be allowed.
Politics may trump economics, with confrontations between the central government and supporters of a more democratic Hong Kong continuing to generate social unrest. And, Hongkongers’ fears of what economic integration means for the city’s political freedoms may hold back their embrace of the opportunities that could emerge under the new Greater Bay Area strategy. Either way, Hong Kong may be in even more difficulty when the next Year of the Pig rolls around in 2031.

David Zweig is chair professor of Social Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Managing Director of Transnational China Consulting Limited.

Post