Letters to the Editor, August 5, 2013
The government's waste management policies and plans, or to be more correct the long-standing deficiency of them, has fired many well-considered letters to these columns.
The government's waste management policies and plans, or to be more correct the long-standing deficiency of them, has fired many well-considered letters to these columns.
In particular, the Environmental Protection Department's dogged intention to locate a massive offshore waste incinerator on Shek Kwu Chau has been the source of bitter criticism.
These columns have also been addressed several times by an executive director of Green Island Cement (Holdings), offering a time- and cost-effective plan at a more convenient location.
The department has never responded to these letters, and thus gives the impression that it does not welcome any private sector initiative in waste management - perhaps it prefers to waste public funds? The only comprehensible reason for the selection of Shek Kwu Chau appears to be that it avoids a hostile reaction from vested landed interests if a more logical site in the New Territories was chosen.
Green Island Cement is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, and according to the company profile, the group is aggressively seeking business opportunities in environmental development.
Those New Territories interests must be powerful indeed if they can cause the government to knock back the interests of Li Ka-shing.