Advertisement
OpinionLetters

Town Planning Board a rubber stamp for the government

The Town Planning Board has lost its credibility to independently represent the public interest in planning matters, which after all is its statutory purpose.

2-MIN READ2-MIN
Thomas Chow Tat-ming

The Town Planning Board has lost its credibility to independently represent the public interest in planning matters, which after all is its statutory purpose.

The current practice of appointing the permanent secretary for development as the chairman of the board confirms that the board is just a stepping stone for the implementation of the government's plans, no matter how publicly controversial they may be.

The recent cases of 27 Lugard Road [conversion into a hotel] and Central harbourfront have justified criticism that the board is little more than a rubber stamp.

Advertisement

Filibustering is a sign of a dysfunctional system, where frustration takes over from honest argument and debate.

In effect, the public is now filibustering the board as 2,000 people requested to address the meeting where the plans for a military base on the Central waterfront were discussed, but only eight of the initial scheduled speakers showed up, and they walked out due to the inflexibility and bureaucratic intransigence of board chairman Thomas Chow Tat-ming ("Angry activists walk out of talks on new PLA base", November 5).
Advertisement

The government and civil servants no longer respect any opposing views or community opinion, including those of the Legislative Council and district council members.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x