In his analysis of US-China relations, Gregory Mitrovich states that the current situation is different from the Cold War era competition between the US and the Soviet Union, which is correct. However, his conclusion that it is less dangerous is misleading (“ Why Cold War comparisons with US-China relations do more harm than good ”, August 11). It has long been US policy to see its values of freedom and democracy as universal, and the attainment thereof as something to be promoted globally. This policy has been supported by the economic dominance of the US and a perception that, despite missteps when carrying out the removal of regimes it dislikes, it practises what it preaches. Also, the force of arms is always in support of US policy goals, marked by continuing and extensive investment in the military. The governance and diplomacy of the current administration and fading economic dominance have undermined US influence, making it more dependent on coercion rather than persuasion. Mitrovich is correct that China does not seek to export its ideology, but it certainly seeks to extend its influence internationally through policies such as Belt and Road Initiative. Most controversially, there is China’s nine-dash line in the South China Sea, a major trade channel. To defend its position and policies, the Chinese government is also investing in its armed forces. Both China and the US are pressured by present circumstances to expand their militaries. Given present tensions between the two, there appear to be few, if any, diplomatic channels in place to avoid mishaps or misunderstandings and de-escalate if they occur. Is this dangerous? Yes. Will it outlast the current US administration? Nobody knows. David Hall, Mid-Levels