Advertisement
Advertisement
Taiwan
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
US President Joe Biden attends an Indo-Pacific Economic Framework launch event at the Izumi Garden Gallery in Tokyo on May 23. Photo: Reuters

Letters | US excluding Taiwan from Indo-Pacific Economic Framework sends mixed message

  • After underscoring Taiwan’s role in the region earlier this month, the US finally decided not to include the island in the framework
  • The decision highlights inconsistencies in the US’ policy in the region and its commitment to helping Taiwan expand its manoeuvring space
Taiwan
Feel strongly about this letter, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.
The United States has a considerable gap to make up in Asia as China has gained an advantage with its level of economic engagement. The Biden administration has continued to talk the talk but not walk the walk with its failure to include Taiwan in its Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF).

US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan elaborated on the decision by reiterating Washington’s commitment to deepening economic ties with Taiwan but “on a bilateral basis”. In doing so, the US is trying to avoid further antagonising China while reassuring Beijing about Washington’s commitment to maintaining the status quo across the Taiwan Strait.

The US is sending mixed messages about its relationship with Taiwan, though. On May 5, Washington underscored that Taiwan is “a key US partner in the Indo-Pacific” and that both sides “have deep and growing commercial, financial and trade ties”. As Taiwan lacks a strong foothold in many international institutions, Washington’s decision to leave the island out only further curbs its institutional engagement.

Being economically intertwined with like-minded countries in the region would not only help expand Taiwan’s economic ties but also enhance regional powers’ motivation to support the island. Hence, the US sidelining of Taiwan will raise questions about Washington’s commitment to helping Taiwan expand its manoeuvring space and to “encourage Taiwan’s meaningful participation in organisations where its membership is not possible”, in the words of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

The US decision to exclude Taiwan could represent a victory for China, which has stepped up its military and economic coercion against the island. A Global Times report on May 19 characterised US lawmakers’ proposal to include Taiwan in the deal as cooperation with the US government’s playing of the “Taiwan card”. China could take advantage of Biden’s concession and increase its economic measures against Taiwan in the coming years.

The US has embraced a policy of “strategic ambiguity” when it comes to Taiwan. Closing the door on Taiwan’s inclusion in the IPEF is likely to adversely affect US-Taiwan ties. Additionally, the US move reveals a lack of consistency in its policy of bolstering collective resilience against economic coercion and has made the likelihood of Taiwan’s participation in Biden’s Asian economic initiative at a future date more unlikely.

Huynh Tam Sang, international relations lecturer, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho Chi Minh City

4