Better system needed to conserve heritage
- The existing gradings for conserving buildings are notoriously half-hearted
- A new assessment criteria and more effective mechanism is needed as the city moves to preserve post-war architecture
With so many buildings of heritage value already knocked down over the past century, it makes sense to start conserving the modern ones before it is too late. The proposal by government advisers to move on to post-war architecture is therefore welcome. However, the existing approach can hardly save graded buildings. If we are serious about starting a new chapter in heritage conservation, a more effective mechanism is called for.
The existing three-tier grading system is notorious for being half-hearted in conservation. Except the 120 declared monuments which enjoy statutory protection, the 1,000-plus graded “historic buildings” can still be demolished if their owners so wish. The grading means nothing more than an advisory to preserve the structure wholly or partly. Non-compliance has no consequences. Examples of redevelopment of architectural gems abound.
Advisers say new assessment criteria may be needed for modern buildings. The existing ones for appraising old buildings, such as historical importance, architectural merit, authenticity, rarity, community influence, may not be applicable. Whether a modern building deserves protection is also open to debate. A general perception is that post-war buildings are often utilitarian in design or similar in appearance. For instance, is a really worth preserving a public housing estate merely because of its colourful facade?
It is good that the new chairman of the Antiquities Advisory Board has assured that he would not dodge the issue. Given the city’s strong appetite for urban development and renewal, the advisers are literally racing against time to preserve heritage. An early stocktaking of our modern architecture is the right step forward. And a more effective mechanism is needed.
Rare example of pre-war Hong Kong architecture to be destroyed
It has been said that every style of architecture relates to the public and the prevailing times. Yet its significance is often unappreciated until superseded. Sadly, little is left to show what we looked like a century ago. Do we want to be a city with few traces of the past or one that showcases our changes through time? The choice is clear. Without better conservation efforts, what we have now may also be lost in the mists of time.
