The trade war shows China’s economic dream is dying. Beijing now has a choice: open up or stagnate
- The US is demanding that China change course and, for all its growth and promises, Beijing is in no position to argue: in tech, it still lags at least 10 years behind the US and doesn’t have the depth of skills to produce its own high-end goods
For decades, China’s development path has seemed clear. State management of key industries coupled with some level of free-market liberalisation elsewhere have made it easy to imagine that the country would soon return to superpower glory.
While it is easy to imagine that some on Capitol Hill have seen what is coming for a decade or more, it will be hard for people in China, especially among the country’s leadership, to accept that this path to glory is coming to an end. Yet China has been fooling itself, its hopes stoked by enthusiastic foreign investors, the rhetoric of local academics and the dreams of its own people.
Stronger ties between China and Russia must not leave others out in cold
Markets are focused on the wrong trade war risk
Ultimately, it wants China to conform to the Western liberal free-market system with an end of one-party rule. “Do it our way” is the message, and remember that America is the unrivalled global superpower.
How Huawei can reverse its fortunes: offer its 5G for free
So what comes next? Accepting America’s trade terms will be hard. China can probably retain its role as a global production hub but only if it pays financial tribute for the privilege. It will be allowed to develop hi-tech firms like Huawei but the keys to the technology will stay in the US, Germany, Japan and South Korea.
Going it alone will be just as difficult. Rejecting the US means accepting that China cannot compete in the economic sectors which offer global power because it cannot catch up technologically. It will only be able to offer defence, automotive, telecoms and other high-end products to countries which cannot afford the best, and only then if the US and its allies allow.
Going it alone means that the tide of inward investment will gradually flow in the opposite direction, and China will become more closed to the world, the Soviet Union of the 21st century, perhaps.
The choice between accepting one humiliation or the other will have consequences for Chinese society for decades, and for the rest of the world.
Graeme Maxton is an economist and author