Eye on Asia | Why a Japan-South Korea trade war would not be a case of ‘both sides are at fault’ – Tokyo must compensate its wartime victims
- Japan’s claims that it is restricting the export of hi-tech materials to South Korea on ‘national security’ grounds are clearly absurd: Tokyo is trying to avoid paying compensation to victims of wartime atrocities for which it is still liable

In short, Japan has basically admitted that it is carrying out an economic sanction against an ally, under a false pretext designed to skirt WTO rules, because it doesn’t want its companies held liable for wartime crimes. How does the Japanese government justify this?
Tokyo’s argument goes like this: the 1965 treaty between Japan and Korea has “settled completely and finally” all colonial-era claims. In return, Japan provided Korea with US$800 million in grants and loans. Individual claims, such as compensation for victims of forced labour, should therefore be handled by the Korean government, which took the money.
When Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe exhorted Koreans to “keep the promises between nations”, this was the viewpoint he had in mind.

