Advertisement
Advertisement
Baby formula
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
A move by a Chinese firm to buy Australian milk powder company Bellamy’s could come under intense scrutiny – but should it? Photo: Reuters

Nations must show investment sense

  • As China seeks to diversify assets and ensure security of supply, especially for food, it faces thorough scrutiny from countries suspicious of its intentions
Baby formula

An Australian baby milk formula company would not usually be considered a sensitive asset. But in a climate of concern in Western countries about Beijing’s intentions, the planned acquisition of Bellamy’s Organic by China Mengniu Dairy will be thoroughly scrutinised.

The deal has to be taken up by the nation’s Foreign Investment Review Board as a matter of course; rules require that of companies linked to state-owned enterprises, as the Chinese firm is. There is great mistrust of China in Australia, though, leading to the purchase getting an extraordinary amount of public attention.

Shareholders back Mengniu’s A$1.5 billion offer (US$1 billion), which has lifted Bellamy’s value by more than 50 per cent. The deal makes good sense for both firms, giving greater access to the Chinese market, where 15 million babies are born each year.

China’s mothers are already familiar with the brand, which capitalised on the 2008 melamine scandal to gain a foothold and build a reputation as a trusted product. The deal can hardly be viewed as a strategic, security or intellectual property threat.

Mengniu Dairy aims to buy Australia baby milk formula maker Bellamy’s

Bellamy’s gets most of the raw materials for its milk powder from overseas, so such supplies are not at risk for Australia. Intellectual property should not be of concern, nor can the product be called a strategic asset, like an airport.

US President Donald Trump’s trade war with China and a campaign to prevent allied countries from using Chinese technology on security grounds have led some nations to shun investments.

Some nations, Britain, Italy and others that have signed on to Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative among them, continue to welcome Chinese firms. But there is a sense that the trend of big-name companies being taken over will be less common.

Australia, the closest ally of the United States in the Asia-Pacific, has been especially mindful of growing Chinese influence and several scandals and disputes have further altered perceptions. But China’s growth means it will want to diversify assets and seek security of supply, especially for food.

Nations have every right to want to protect sensitive industries, but they should also use common sense in decisions. Like shareholders, they should make the most of opportunities.

Post