-
Advertisement
Carrie Lam policy address 2019
Opinion
SCMP Editorial

Editorial | It’s make or break for Carrie Lam as she prepares to deliver her policy address

  • The chief executive has already missed a series of golden opportunities to turn the tide. It would be truly, in her own words, unforgivable if she again fails to seize the occasion to save the city

2-MIN READ2-MIN
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor meets the media before the Executive Council Meeting at the Central Government Offices in Tamar this month. Photo: SCMP

The stakes for the chief executive’s policy speech have never been higher. With the social unrest raging for months and her fate hanging in the balance, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor could make or break her leadership with her third annual address on Wednesday.

 Lam is not only under tremendous pressure to deliver a well-thought-out strategy to end the chaos, she also needs to restore confidence in her governance and rekindle hope in the city’s future.

A midterm policy blueprint would be challenging enough even without the turmoil triggered by the now-shelved extradition bill. Apart from the need for previous measures on housing and other deep-seated problems to show results, there is also growing pressure for Lam to make good on the other promises made when she ran for office.  All these, however, have been overshadowed by months of violent protests.

Advertisement

 Whether she can follow tradition by delivering the address in the legislature remains to be seen. A recorded speech is being prepared in case she cannot do so for security reasons. While the option has been criticised by some lawmakers, the substance matters more than the format. From setting the right tone for reconciliation to tackling the crisis with effective measures, Lam needs to convince the public why she deserves another chance.

Lam’s disapproval rating is at 74 per cent. Photo: SCMP
Lam’s disapproval rating is at 74 per cent. Photo: SCMP
Advertisement

There have been calls for more sweeteners to ease public anger. But such an approach would only show officials have no idea how to tackle the underlying grievances.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x