Advertisement

My Take | Develop some Hong Kong country parks into public flats

  • To improve people’s living conditions, the law protecting country parks needs an overhaul, while the maximum queuing time for public housing needs to be set by law to halve the current unacceptable average time of six years

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Hiking practice trail at the Tai Mo Shan Country Park.Photo: K. Y. Cheng
Alex Loin Toronto
Six months of civil unrest have sent many people back to the history books to re-examine how the colonial government responded to challenges in the aftermath of the 1967 riots. The late governor Murray MacLehose is often held up as an example to follow.
Advertisement

If this means an updated expansion of the social safety net for all Hongkongers and a campaign to reduce drastic social and economic inequalities as well as restoring social cohesiveness, it’s an absolute must for the government.

But there is a signature policy set by MacLehose that has outlived its usefulness and needs an overhaul: the Country Parks Ordinance. The law has made such parks and other areas virtually untouchable, despite enormous pressure on the government to boost land supply.

The government’s policy should no longer be to boost home ownership, but quality living conditions. Opening some country park areas for public housing development should therefore be allowed. A minority of hard-core green activists would object on principle. However, most critics oppose because of fear that it would be open to private development and therefore become another bonanza for local developers.

This legitimate concern can be addressed by writing into the law to ban any private development in place of public or subsidised housing. In Hong Kong, only 25 per cent of total land area is developed. Country parks take up about 40 per cent, while reservoirs and green belts take up most of the rest.

Advertisement
Advertisement