Opinion | Hong Kong’s management of the coronavirus epidemic is an evolving science, even after the lessons of Sars
- To be prepared for an outbreak is important but that provides only a framework. Any plan needs to be constantly informed by the emerging science in an epidemic, and complemented by real-time surveillance to gather effective intelligence in a fast-changing situation

On March 10, 2003, the severe acute respiratory syndrome unceremoniously announced its foothold in Hong Kong in an outbreak of the infection at the Prince of Wales Hospital, eventually infecting 239 health care professionals, medical students, patients and visitors.
It exposed Hong Kong’s vulnerability to new and emerging infectious diseases, in its geopolitical position and as an open economy with free flows of people, goods and services across its borders. Also evident were our public health inadequacies in surveillance for early detection and in rapid responses to threats.
Even the most robust preparedness plans, however regularly updated, can only provide a framework when there is insufficient knowledge and understanding of the nature of the agent and the range of its effects on the host. The application of strategies and measures to control the outbreak has to be assessed in real time as science unravels the mystery.
