China has actively worked with the WHO to fight the coronavirus. Now, other countries should too
- China’s lockdown measures have helped slow the international spread of Covid-19. As the epidemic enters a new phase, China should continue to support the WHO’s global disease control efforts by sharing data, experience and innovation
How has China’s cooperation with the WHO helped the global fight against Covid-19? And with the epidemic entering a new phase, how should China further cooperate?
In my opinion, the key lies in supporting and enhancing the WHO’s central role in international disease prevention and control.
Covid-19 exposes the Achilles’ heel of China’s Communist Party power
Second, China has further strengthened the WHO’s role as an institution of global cooperation. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO director general, said Chinese data had been “very important in enabling WHO to provide good evidence-based advice to countries”.
China also contributed to the epidemiological findings disclosed in the WHO experts’ report. And it is worth mentioning that the State Council Information Office held a press conference in English on March 4, where frontline medical experts spoke about treating Covid-19.
However, some principles and lessons can be drawn. Political commitment is essential if such a large-scale public health challenge is to be addressed. Holding out the false hope that one can keep oneself aloof and safe from the epidemic will just jeopardise global efforts to combat the virus.
Fortunately, many countries are mobilising to tackle the threat. In its updated recommendations for international travel, the WHO said effective control measures included “active surveillance for the early detection and isolation of cases” and recommended that travellers “self-monitor for symptoms for 14 days”.
From Sars to Covid-19, what lessons has Singapore learned?
Admittedly, as the coronavirus spreads past China’s borders, the situation has become more complicated. From my perspective, three efforts can be made to promote international cooperation within the WHO framework.
China should also improve border surveillance under the WHO’s latest guidance, and continue to take part in discussions on a global strategy to combat Covid-19. After all, in an age of globalisation, cooperation works the best and costs the least.
Why Vietnam can’t replace China as the world’s manufacturing hub
Third, Chinese enterprises can contribute via technical innovation. For example, during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, Chinese refrigeration company Aucma was licensed to build coolers that could keep vaccines cold in places with limited electricity. This made it possible to store vaccines in the African heat.
In response to Covid-19, Chinese companies have deployed technologies to eliminate human contact and prevent the spread of the virus: using autonomous vehicles to deliver goods to medical workers, robots to disinfect hospitals and drones to conduct thermal scans of huge crowds. If properly developed, these technologies could help improve the public health systems of many developing countries.
In the face of this global health challenge, the world needs a strong and effective WHO more than ever. Indifference, unilateralism or political attacks would only erode the cornerstone of international cooperation. China has taken the lead in supporting the WHO and should continue to make important contributions.
And the international community needs to realise the truth of what the WHO argued as long ago as 2007, when it said in a report that “collective international public health action can build a safer future for humanity”. Countries should see they are in the same boat, and should help each other stay afloat.
Tang Bei is Associate Professor at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, at Shanghai International Studies University, and a China Forum expert