The recent deal struck between the United States and Afghanistan’s Taliban to end their 18-year conflict was a historic effort to bring peace to the war-wracked nation. While lacking the oversight of Kabul, it still offered a chance to move beyond decades of combat. But within weeks of its signing, continuing violence, a wrangling over a promised prisoner swap and the country’s political chaos would appear to augur poorly for talks to begin the reconciliation process. There is still reason for optimism, though, the departure of foreign forces giving hope Afghans will have an opportunity to chart their own course without outside interference.

American troops are already withdrawing as part of the deal, with all to be out in 14 months if security conditions are met. The Taliban has agreed not to provide sanctuary to foreign terror groups in exchange for the US lifting sanctions. But fighting between the Islamic group and government forces has continued. New unrest also threatens as a result of rivalry between President Ashraf Ghani, who won last September’s election, and Abdullah Abdullah, who declared themselves the country’s leader at separate swearing-in ceremonies in Kabul on March 9. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced on Monday a cut of US$1 billion in aid to Afghanistan after failing to convince the men to end their feud.

Dual Afghan presidents lead to constitutional crisis

Negotiators were careful not to portray the agreement as a peace deal. Although the Taliban has pledged to end its fight with foreign troops, it has vowed to continue attacks on Afghan security forces until a prisoner swap takes place. In a positive development on Sunday, the group and the government held a Skype meeting in a bid to resolve the dispute; authorities want a phased and conditional release of inmates and the Taliban wants them freed all at once.