Advertisement
Hong Kong extradition bill
Opinion
SCMP Editorial

Opinion | Time for Legco to get back to business and put differences aside

  • The high-profile attack by Beijing on delaying tactics by pro-democrats puts more lawmakers at risk of disqualification with important decisions yet to be taken

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
The Estimates of Expenditure 2020-2021 at the Legislative Council Complex, Tamar. Photo: May Tse
Months before the Covid-19 epidemic forced Hong Kong into a near standstill, the city’s legislature was already under “political lockdown”. For almost half a year, the Legislative Council has been left in limbo because of the pan-democrats’ move to block the House Committee from electing a chairman to get on with an array of business. Regrettably, the stalemate has faded into oblivion as the heath crisis deepens.
The deadlock is back in the spotlight following a high-profile attack by Beijing on Monday. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office questioned whether the filibuster amounted to misconduct and a breach of oath, referring to the lawmakers’ pledge to serve the public and uphold the Basic Law. The liaison office in the city went further, accusing Civic Party legislator Dennis Kwok, who presided over 14 meetings without electing a chairman, of preventing Legco from fulfilling its constitutional duties.

Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor yesterday rejected claims that Beijing had interfered and instead hit out at lawmakers for encouraging foreign intervention. She would not be drawn on whether action should be taken against Kwok, saying the way forward was for Legco to resolve the matter on its own.

Advertisement

Whether the delaying tactics amount to a breach of oath and misconduct in public office is open to debate. In any case, such investigations shall be a matter for the Hong Kong government to consider under the Basic Law. The opposition criticised the two offices for interfering in the city’s internal affairs and undermining the key principle of “one country, two systems”. But given its growing stress on having comprehensive jurisdiction over Hong Kong, Beijing is likely to speak out on issues of importance when needed. The strong remarks underline its growing impatience with the impasse.

Its criticism has also been seen as targeting the Legco elections in September. Following their landslide victory in the district council elections last November, the pan-democrats hope that sentiments arising from the social unrest last year will also help them clinch a majority in the legislature. Given such a result would have far-reaching implications for governance, Beijing is understandably concerned.
Advertisement

At stake are not just the appointment of the next chief justice and dozens of bills caught up in the current backlog. The opposition may think it can score by stalling a controversial national anthem law. But Beijing’s response shows the row may easily escalate into another disqualification saga if it is not handled properly. Lawmakers from across the political spectrum should put aside their differences and get on with Legco business in accordance with the Basic Law.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x