Advertisement
Coronavirus pandemic
Opinion
Chen Dongxiao
Shao Yuqun
Chen DongxiaoandShao Yuqun

Opinion | Donald Trump’s decision to halt US funding to the World Health Organisation could have devastating consequences, especially in the developing world

  • An abrupt cessation of US funding will not only hobble the WHO’s fight against Covid-19, especially in developing nations, but will also hamper the organisation’s ability to counter other health threats such as Ebola

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A woman walks past a mural advocating safe practices to curb the spread of Covid-19 at a slum in Nairobi, Kenya, on April 29. Photo: AFP
US President Donald Trump announced the suspension of American funding to the World Health Organisation last month, pending a review of the international health body’s “mismanagement, cover-ups and failures” in the unfolding coronavirus crisis.

This reckless announcement follows the release of a G20 joint statement on March 27 which called for worldwide concerted efforts to “close the financing gap in the WHO Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan”.

The Trump administration’s move against the WHO is as anachronistic as it is anti-intellectual. Defunding this multilateral health body, which is the backbone of the fight against Covid-19, will put the health and safety of hundreds of millions of people in the developing world in greater peril. In this sense, Trump’s foolhardy decision goes against humanity.

Advertisement
A specialised United Nations agency founded in 1948 and now with 194 member states, the WHO is designed to promote the highest standard of human health by playing the dual role of pre-eminent information hub and chief coordinator in times of global health emergencies. Even as the world is locked in a fight to contain the spread of the coronavirus, other public health threats, such as the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, continue unabated.

Indeed, the WHO is facing multiple challenges, ranging from capacity building in the allocation of international resources to forging partnerships with a growing number of actors in global public health governance.

Nevertheless, the guidance and help the WHO provides are indispensable, especially to the developing world. No other organisation in the UN system, or elsewhere, can fulfil these functions. Neither can the United States set up a new specialised institution in its place overnight.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x