EditorialRe-examine RTHK’s dual role in highly politicised climate

RTHK has consistently received international recognition for its quality programmes, as evidenced in the awards it has procured over the years. But its dual status as a government department also makes it a target of attack, especially at a time when society has become more politicised.

While greater sensitivity towards different views and expectations is needed to enhance its performance, there needs to be an environment conducive to its development as a public service broadcaster. A rethink in its long-term status is called for.

The latest criticism by the Communications Authority in relation to a signature programme poking fun at the police has added to a long list of controversies surrounding the government-funded broadcaster. For decades, the programme Headliner has tapped into hot-button issues in a humorous and satirical way.

But an episode in February elicited complaints from the police commissioner and thousands of others. It was deemed by the authority as “denigrating and insulting” the force. Earlier, RTHK was criticised for violating the “one China” principle after its reporter asked a World Health Organisation official a question related to the coronavirus outbreak and Taiwan’s membership. Another commentary programme also came under fire for “inaccuracy” and “incitement of hatred”.

The rows are unsurprising as society has become more politicised in the wake of the social unrest that began last year. The growing tension means the work of all media outlets is subject to closer scrutiny. The dual role of RTHK has complicated the matter further. While it enjoys editorial independence as a public service broadcaster under a charter, it is also bound by the norms and rules of a government department.