George Floyd protests: lessons for Hong Kong on tackling police brutality and protester violence
- The events in the US highlight the terrible consequences of insufficient checks and balances on police power
- Using brute force only sows greater discontent, radicalisation and long-term instability. Addressing the causes of violence is harder but more effective
Floyd’s death also sheds light on the endemic, detrimental effects of an unchecked police force, and how the lack of checks and balances can transform officers into killing machines.
02:38
Carrie Lam accuses protest-plagued US of ‘double standards’ over national security
Amid the broader politicisation of Floyd’s death, here are the lessons for Hong Kong.
The causes of police brutality range from a lack of racial sensitivity or civil liberties training and the absence of well-devised protocols to more nefarious prejudices and emotive judgments that influence police action.
Ensuring compliance with the law is of paramount importance, but the actions of the police – from frontline officers to their commanders – must be checked by internal pressures and external scrutiny.
03:56
Unrest spreads across the US fuelled by outrage over police killing of George Floyd
We should not be competing over which jurisdiction has worse police brutality.
Hong Kong police need to be whiter than white to shed ‘black’ label as protests return
The second lesson is that fixing violence requires dynamic and comprehensive solutions. The authorities should listen to the people, then arrive at a shared understanding or identify common ground, even if it is scant.
In the US, this would mean getting both sides to agree that black Americans’ grievances are valid and that peaceful political demonstration should not be suppressed.
Hongkongers divided over lessons from American unrest
Momentarily stopping violence is easy – all you need is a well-equipped police force. But using brute force only sows the seeds of greater discontent, radicalisation and long-term instability.
Resolving the causes of violence is harder but necessary. We need a comprehensive basket of solutions, including judicious punishments and legal sanctions, rehabilitative community programmes, and systemic reforms in governance to convince the public that violence is not the way out.
If it does not act now, the US today could well be Hong Kong tomorrow and find itself embroiled in a de facto civil war between the public and the government.
Hong Kong may use anti-terror laws against radical groups, says security chief
Those who view democracy through rosy lenses must realise that democracy alone cannot heal a deeply divided and polarised society. In the US, governance is clearly broken, making the country now perhaps the worst advocate for liberal democracy.
The way out is not unrestrained majoritarianism ending up with disenfranchised minorities, neither is it authoritarian rollbacks of civil liberties. Politicians should exhibit courage and responsibility by listening, apologising and making amends – otherwise, all talk of restoring “peace and stability” is futile.
Brian YS Wong is an MPhil (political theory) candidate at Wolfson College, Oxford, and current Rhodes Scholar-elect for Hong Kong in 2020