Advertisement
Advertisement
The Huawei logo is displayed on an iPhone. Huawei is just one Chinese firm caught in the crossfire of escalating US-China confrontations. Photo: Bloomberg
Opinion
Macroscope
by Aidan Yao
Macroscope
by Aidan Yao

China’s role in global supply chains will change, but probably not overnight

  • China’s PPE and tech industries are likely to be hardest hit by supply chain reconfiguration, given the West’s growing wariness of security risks. However, Beijing can slow the tide of manufacturing moving out
Tensions between Washington and Beijing have ratcheted up after the Trump administration ordered a ban on TikTok and tried to force the sale of the popular Chinese video app to Microsoft. Following the blacklisting of ZTE, Huawei and other Chinese firms, TikTok is another victim caught in the crossfire of escalating US-China confrontations.
While the fate of the company hangs in the balance, one thing for sure is that TikTok won’t be the last casualty in the US-China rivalry for technology leadership. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is already calling for the removal of “untrusted” Chinese mobile apps from the Google and Apple app stores.
These moves, building on previous protectionist acts, could contribute to a further rupture in bilateral economic ties and facilitate an eventual decoupling of the two nations. Of all the areas where the two countries are growing apart, technology and supply chains are of the greatest importance to China’s long-term economic development.
In a previous column, I noted that foreign firms drawn to China for its low-cost production are most likely to redirect their supply chains to cheaper locations, as China’s cost advantage has been eroded over time by rising wages, higher land costs and increased tariffs.

In contrast, foreign firms that want to tap into China’s vast domestic market are less likely to exit. Recent surveys by the American and European chambers of commerce show that a majority of respondents have no intention of leaving China despite the ongoing trade war and the Covid-19 economic shock.

With the third group of businesses drawn to China’s comprehensive production ecosystem, the picture is less clear. On the one hand, the reasons to stay remain as strong as ever, with China’s infrastructure, logistic networks and supply of educated workers significantly superior to those of its emerging-market peers.

On the other hand, these merits now need to be weighed against higher tariffs, potential sanctions, technology restrictions and heightened political pressure, which are all part of the business environment – the new normal – that multinational corporations must adapt to.

Post-Covid-19, globalisation and supply chains will be changed forever

Some supply chain relocation is inevitable, but it won’t be an either-or decision in most cases. The practical decision lies somewhere between exiting China completely and maintaining the status quo; and the actual change will be more nuanced and sector-specific.

Here are three predictions: First, the personal protective equipment, or PPE, industry is likely to see some dramatic changes to its global supply chains. The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the vulnerability of countries that outsourced the manufacturing of PPE to foreign suppliers, compromising security for efficiency.

01:20

Louis Vuitton retrofits French workshops for mask production amid coronavirus pandemic

Louis Vuitton retrofits French workshops for mask production amid coronavirus pandemic
As the largest producer of PPE, China stands to lose some ground amid shifting supply chain dynamics as the US and Europe, its biggest customers, become more wary of national security risks.

Second, the technology industry is also susceptible to change as the global tech war rages. Electronics manufacturing accounts for more than half of Asia’s value-added and China is at the centre of this production ecosystem. China’s potential losses in this area could be substantially larger than those in the PPE industry.

Why Covid-19 won’t weaken China’s role in global supply chain

A more systemic issue beyond the manufacturing of electronics is tech decoupling. Supply chains built up around technologies such as 5G could be fractured in a world with multiple technical standards and incompatible networks.

As global manufacturing is increasingly fused with technology, such tech fragmentation could speed up the deglobalisation process, undermining not just the economic prospects of China, but the world at large.

The final prediction concerns timing – that, in the absence of strong political pressure, the reconfiguration of supply chains could be slow and gradual.

Corporate capital expenditure has fallen victim to the ongoing pandemic, which is hampering business confidence and investment appetites. With China now leading the world in resuming production, this is not the best time for multinationals to redirect supply chains away from a base where operational capacity is most secure and reliable.

In addition, continued reforms in China could make exits more costly. Recent moves by Beijing to reduce foreign direct investment restrictions, strengthen intellectual property protection, accelerate financial sector liberalisation, and open up monopoly industries all aim to create a more accessible market and level the playing field. While these moves will not completely prevent supply chain changes, they could slow the process.

As the largest beneficiary of globalisation, China could now bleed the most as the tide reverses. While some losses are inevitable, I think China has the means to manage the speed and scale of the tumult by accelerating much-needed reforms.

If done right, China can still maintain some influence over the supply chains that move out of the country by going from “Made in China” to “Made around China”. Stay tuned for my next piece on how this may be achieved.

Aidan Yao is Senior Emerging Asia Economist at AXA Investment Managers

Post