Editorial | Life ban for Hong Kong teacher raises concerns over freedom of discussion
- Action over ‘pro-independence’ materials is likely to have a chilling effect on Hong Kong’s education sector, but rights guaranteed under the Basic Law must be observed
With Beijing becoming increasingly assertive on issues of sovereignty and unity, the Hong Kong government will, like it or not, defend its red lines more vigorously.
The education sector is a case in point. Seen by some as the cradle of opposition and defiance, it is under growing pressure to clean up its act before the authorities step in, as reflected in the lifelong disqualification of a primary school teacher in connection with perceived “pro-independence” learning materials.
Officials are obviously keen to teach schools and teachers a lesson they think has been long overdue. However, the unprecedented move has not just raised questions on procedural justice, but also the boundaries of discussions and its possible chilling effect on wider academia.
It is not surprising that social media has been flooded with comments critical of the punishment. From the material in question to the deregistration procedure, there is much support for the teacher concerned.
While some say he did nothing wrong in using a documentary featuring Andy Chan Ho-tin, the founder of the now-banned pro-independence Hong Kong National Party, and other material to assist in what was said to be a discussion concerning freedom of speech, the authorities branded it as advocating separatism and banned him.
03:40
Hong Kong security law prompts ‘yellow’ cafe to clear opposition Post-it notes from Lennon wall
Invalidating a professional qualification for life is a serious matter. The process must not only be fair and rigorous, but also be able to stand up in the event of a legal challenge.