Advertisement
US-China decoupling
Opinion
Tony Xiuye Zhao
Hans Yue Zhu
Tony Xiuye ZhaoandHans Yue Zhu

Opinion | Forget decoupling. The US and China are better together

  • The businesses, livelihoods and people that make up the deep and strong bilateral relationship will only be hurt by decoupling. That bilateral trade grew despite US-China tensions is proof of the ties that bind

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Illustration: Craig Stephens
After President Donald Trump assumed office, US policy on China has taken a trenchant turn, characterised by an “America first” protectionism aimed at decoupling the two economies. Since the trade war started in mid-2018, the US and China have ramped up trade tariffs, sanctioned companies and even closed consulates.

From the economy to geopolitics, from technology to ideology, the US-China conflict, which recalls US-Soviet tensions, is being labelled by many as the beginning of a new cold war.

With calls for decoupling gaining vogue, armchair strategists are drawing up policies with seemingly little idea of how the US-China relationship was built up and how it functions. A closer look reveals why the relationship should not be rashly cut off. It is neither weak nor useless. Bound up with the lives of many individuals, the relationship is not something for politicians to play with.

Decoupling has become a slogan adopted by the White House to demonstrate its anti-China stance. In mid-June, Trump tweeted that “a complete decoupling from China” remained a US policy option. Facing a tough election battle at home, he upped the ante against China last month by pledging to reward companies that move their factories from China to the US.
Advertisement

Trump’s goal, as he put it, is to make America a “manufacturing superpower” and “end our reliance on China once and for all”. To show his resolution, Trump also threatened to impose tariffs on US companies “that desert America to create jobs in China”.

But terminating economic ties with China is not as easy as it sounds. Relocation costs is but one aspect and interfering with global supply chains could end up overhauling market structures and leaving local consumers and producers to pay the price.

Indeed, along both sides of the US-China relationship rest the livelihoods of many. Former speaker of the US House of Representatives Tip O’Neil said that “all politics is local”; for those who operate between the US and China, all business is local too. When politicians talk about trade and investment in numbers that run to billions, it is easy to ignore the real-life impact behind them.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x