Opinion | Why the US-led Quad alliance won’t realise its ‘Asian Nato’ ambition against China
- Beyond the informal grouping’s four members of US, Japan, India and Australia, there are few other truly free and democratic countries in Asia
- Many in the region are also reluctant to jeopardise ties with China, especially given its vaccine diplomacy in time of a global pandemic

Just as Nato became a unified bastion of democracy against the Soviet Union, the Quad is hoping to become its era-appropriate equivalent: a bulwark against the rise of China. Unfortunately for Washington and its allies, that is unlikely to happen.
It was in the shadow of the proverbial elephant in the room that lay just over a thousand miles away, that the four foreign ministers met to discuss how to counter the rise of China.

00:39
Pompeo urges Asian allies to stand against Beijing’s ‘corruption, coercion’
In a press conference on the day of the Quad meeting, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said: “Once we’ve institutionalised what we’re doing – the four of us together – we can begin to build out a true security framework.” Ever since the Quad’s revival in 2017 and the increasingly Beijing-hostile Trump administration, international-relations watchers have speculated about the Quad’s formalisation and expansion.
