-
Advertisement
My Take
Opinion
Alex Lo

My Take | So you think Hong Kong police create rioters

  • A policing expert repeats the favoured tale of the anti-government protest movement that happens to fit his earlier theory on crowd control to a tee

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
17
Anti-government protesters opens up their umbrellas to defend themselves as they take over Queen’s Road East during an illegal demonstration on the 23rd anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Photo: K. Y. Cheng
Policing expert Clifford Stott’s latest analysis of last year’s anti-government unrest makes for familiar reading. Best-known in Hong Kong for quitting an official probe into the unrest as a protest against the Independent Police Complaints Council, he has now offered his own version of what happened last year.
By and large, his analysis adheres closely to the narrative of the anti-government protest movement, which has also become the accepted wisdom of the international press.

It follows to a tee his earlier notion or theory of how “coercive” policing – rather than one based on consensus and community building – causes crowds such as British football fans, to become more violent than they would otherwise.

Advertisement

Stott is the lead author of “Patterns of ‘Disorder’ During the 2019 Protests in Hong Kong: Policing, Social Identity, Intergroup Dynamics, and Radicalisation”, published in Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.

As we have heard before, the firing of tear gas by police outside the Legislative Council complex on June 12 last year marked a “pivotal moment” when they were first seen as “illegitimate” and “partisan”.

Advertisement

Then the July 1 occupation of the legislature consolidated and empowered the group identity of the protesters and unified a sense of common purpose.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x