History shows the dangerous folly of Carrie Lam’s unopposed governance
- To stay in power, an unopposed government relies on two options: brute force or provision of rising living standards. To judge from her policy address, Lam seems uninterested in meeting ordinary people’s expectations for living standards

In the midst of Hong Kong’s worst crisis in living memory, what should leaders be doing? I would have thought: taking concerted measures to eliminate Covid-19 so that business can get back to normal and jobs can be saved. In the longer term, there is the matter of meeting the expectations of the majority of citizens for their quality of life, through better living conditions and higher salaries. In that regard then, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor’s annual policy address last week was a dismal failure.

01:18
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam explains why her job is one of the toughest in the world
With the coronavirus pandemic and the economic crisis, jobs, wages and living conditions have become hot button issues more than ever, and the latest policy address is fresh evidence of why the city needs a strong, viable opposition.
Dictatorships – for that is what China, and by reason of sovereignty Hong Kong, is – do not want opposition. They can’t impose their will, take advantage and stay in power if they allow criticism.
