
Covid-19, Fukushima legacy and other obstacles stand in the way of Japan’s ‘Recovery Olympics’
- Japan has worked very hard to show that the post-tsunami disaster zone is safe, yet public opinion is turning against the Games
- The problems that led to the Fukushima crisis – lack of transparency and an obstinate and out-of-touch leadership – are still evident
There is nothing subtle about the symbolism. The Olympic torch itself is fashioned, in part, from aluminium recycled from prefab disaster shelters used after the tsunami by evacuees escaping the carnage.
Significantly, in order to perform the difficult balancing act of managing problems related to disaster reconstruction and the Olympics, Japan has cut corners in its massive “decontamination” campaign to produce radiation levels low enough to let many evacuees return home to their communities.
Indeed, many partially resettled communities are located near areas that have higher radiation but are told to avoid them. Most preposterous is the government’s claimed effort, in progress, to “recycle” over 14 million tonnes of irradiated dirt scraped from the surface of fallout-laden areas of Fukushima.
This radioactive waste is now mostly being stored in massive piles of industrial bags that stand in and around the exclusion zone like rival memorials to official hubris. On the 10th anniversary of the triple meltdown, it is scandalous that the state continues to handle this radioactive waste in such a cavalier manner.
In its coronavirus response, Japan must not repeat the mistakes of its handling of the Fukushima nuclear disaster
Also not reassuring was Greenpeace’s discovery, in December 2019, of an unremarked radiation hotspot next to the car park at J-Village. For a weekend visit, such Olympic venues are safe for visitors. But living in a hastily cleared area for 10 years is a different story.
Regardless, for politicians and Japanese mandarins, holding high-profile events like Olympic baseball in a Fukushima venue allows Japan to demonstrate that radiation levels are now negligible and that the area is open for business, while simultaneously deflecting any negative light that the radiation crisis might cast on the Olympic showcase.

Yet the obstacles that confront the torch relay, and the Olympic Games more broadly, are considerable. Amid the very pandemic that forced the postponement of the Games for a year, the state judged that a masked, socially distanced Olympic relay – where cheering is forbidden, due to Covid-19 countermeasures – can proceed, allowing the symbolic torch to meander for four months throughout the disaster zone and beyond.
In the battle against the coronavirus, Japan and the four ‘tiger economies’ offer the world a new ‘Asian miracle’
Will overseas visitors, either ticket holders or potential spectators, be allowed to enter Japan? The travel and commercial activity that accompany the Games are one of the established ways that host cities attempt to recoup the colossal outlays of staging such a sprawling showcase of sport, skill and national spirit.
Not that attending the Games will be as exuberant and carefree as in the past. The organising committee has indicated that spectators will not be allowed to cheer, chant, sing or drink alcohol.
On the 10th anniversary of such a tragic series of events, it is regrettable that the Olympic pageant has soured in the public imagination. Yet some problems that led to the Fukushima crisis again seem apparent – lack of transparency, obstinate and out-of-touch leadership, abstruse decision-making, an unhelpful focus on doctrine and PR. Japan would do well to embrace the unflinching ethical principles that sustain the Olympics in the human imagination.
Peter Wynn Kirby is an anthropologist and geographer based at the University of Oxford. He is also a High-End Overseas Visiting Fellow at Shanghai University
