Coronavirus economic relief: are we getting value for the money thrown at the pandemic?
- The US fiscal deficit rose from 6.4 per cent of GDP in 2019 to 17.5 per cent in 2020
- This is an increase of 11.1 percentage points in GDP fiscal support to defend a decline of 5.8 percentage points in GDP growth
The pandemic has left us a terrible mess to clear up. What policies will get us out of the huge debt we have incurred to pay for the health, wealth and job crises?
US economic growth over the next two years hinges on significant fiscal stimulus and faster vaccination. But is this sustainable?
Almost every country threw money at the pandemic, with very little appreciation for whether we are getting value for money. In a panic, that is understandable. After the panic, the pain and reckoning must begin.
The US fiscal deficit rose from 6.4 per cent of GDP in 2019 to 17.5 per cent in 2020, an increase of 11.1 percentage points in GDP fiscal support to defend a decline of 5.8 percentage points in GDP growth (from 2.3 per cent to -3.5 per cent in 2020). In essence, the US deployed 2 per cent of GDP spending to defend 1 per cent of GDP growth.
The cost to the US is, according to IMF estimates, a rise in gross debt to 128.7 per cent of GDP, far higher than the world average of 97.8 per cent. In comparison, China’s gross fiscal debt was 65.2 per cent of GDP in 2020.
From a political point of view, Biden had no choice. If he does not revive the economy and protect his support base, he will lose the midterm elections in 2022, which would make him a lame duck in the second half of his term.
Joe Biden won’t put his name on US$1,400 stimulus cheques, unlike Donald Trump
Take fiscal and monetary policy. Former US president Ronald Reagan famously said in 1981, “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem”.
The Fed’s stated monetary policy goals are to promote maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates.
While inflation has been kept low at below 2 per cent per annum and unemployment remains low, long-term interest rates are at record low levels, while US inequality numbers have worsened since Reagan from a Gini coefficient of 0.38 in 1981 to 0.48 in 2019.
Why inflation may buck the forecasts and make a comeback
Biden’s “build back better” programme will spend another US$2 trillion over the next four years on building green infrastructure and creating jobs. In comparison, the US spent US$686 billion in 2019 on defence alone; the cost of war since 2001 for America has been US$6.4 trillion and 801,000 deaths.
The Biden administration is betting that the largest US stimulus package since World War II will restore American competitiveness and heal the nation. But much of this is not funded by domestic savings, such as taxing the rich, but by borrowing on the US dollar.
The rest of the world will not fund the dollar forever, certainly not at near-zero interest rates. And if interest rates rise, the fiscal costs would be substantially higher. So bet on the Fed doing more to keep rates low.
The truth of US debt is that it is not debt, but the rest of the world’s equity. America is the world’s too-big-to-fail borrower. If Biden fails, we will lose.
Andrew Sheng is a former central banker and financial regulator. The views expressed here are his own