Editorial | Conundrum on how best to use our port
- Some are calling for the site to be used for housing, while others argue that the logistics industry provides tens of thousands of jobs; how Hong Kong navigates those two essential needs will be a challenge

Not that long ago it would have been hard to imagine Hong Kong’s leader saying that the future of its container port must be resolved sooner or later. It was, after all, one of the world’s busiest. Its future seemed assured. There was certainly no talk of taking back the 300-plus hectares it occupies to meet Hong Kong’s housing shortage. Now it has slipped to No 9. Shenzhen (fourth) and Guangzhou (fifth) have overtaken it. The trend can be expected to continue. These days most of its container business serves the Pearl River Delta and southern China markets.
Urged to take back the land for housing, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor admitted the terminal was now less competitive, but said there were no current plans to change the use of the site. The government is caught in the middle between a land shortage, terminal stakeholders’ rights and the job security of thousands. Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, who sits on Lam’s Executive Council, called on her to commit the land for housing. “Hong Kong does not need that many container ports,” she said. Lam rightly said the issue was sensitive and one that would require strategic planning.
