-
Advertisement
Banking & finance
Opinion
Alex Lo

My Take | George Soros’ case against investing in China is sickeningly hypocritical

  • If enriching the already rich while leaving the poor to their own devices is following the rules of capitalism, I say China will be better off not following – or ‘not understanding’ – them

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
41
Investors look at computer screens showing stock information at a brokerage house in Shanghai, China, in 2016. Photo: Reuters

I don’t know which is worse – greed or hypocrisy. But if I have to choose, I would pick greed any day.

And that really is what the fight over China as an investment target between Wall Street fund manager BlackRock and billionaire George Soros is all about. For clear-eyed investors, the choice should be clear. For American politicians, though, it’s a different matter.

Indeed, they should personally thank Soros for making a semi-plausible case against investing in China and preventing others from doing so, too: it’s for their own good, Soros would say.

Advertisement

Even if wrong and wrong-handed, the self-styled saviour of global democracy is still a lot smarter and more articulate than the average American politician and so has saved them from having to rack their brains to come up with almost convincing arguments against investing in the second, possibly already the largest, economy in the world.

BlackRock’s headquarters in New York, in the United States. Photo: Bloomberg
BlackRock’s headquarters in New York, in the United States. Photo: Bloomberg

BlackRock’s investment case for China

BlackRock, which won a licence in June to become the first global asset manager to start a wholly owned onshore mutual fund business in China, calls on investors to increase their allocations to Chinese equities in their portfolios.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x