Advertisement

Opinion | Amid tensions over Covid-19 origins, China and the world need to cooperate more on biosafety

  • Chinese scientists and regulators fear the space is narrowing for them to pursue normal collaboration on biosafety both in China and outside
  • Their access to scientific knowledge, research materials and laboratory equipment with both civilian and military applications is becoming more restricted

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
The P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Hubei province on April 17, 2020. The facility is among a handful of labs around the world cleared to handle Class 4 pathogens, which are dangerous viruses that pose a high risk of person-to-person transmission. Photo: AFP
Earlier this month, Chinese diplomats proposed a set of biosecurity guidelines at a United Nations meeting in Geneva. Against the backdrop of continuing international tensions over the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, the initiative risks losing traction.

Yet, if biosecurity is too sensitive for the time, it still deserves broad support. It should be an icebreaker in the diplomatic stalemate on cooperation between Chinese and foreign scientists.

World Health Organization documents describe biosafety as “the containment principles, technologies and practices that are implemented to prevent the unintentional exposure to pathogens and toxins, or their accidental release”. Biosafety begins with protecting the scientists and laboratory technicians and workers who handle pathogens.

Advertisement
Biosecurity, meanwhile, is about “the protection, control, and accountability for biological agents and toxins within facilities in order to prevent their loss, theft, misuse, diversion, unauthorised access or intentional unauthorised release”. The range of targets for protection is much wider, including the general public and the environment.

These two terms are often used interchangeably, partly because, as organising principles, they are interlinked. But biosecurity is more tilted towards ascertaining the responsibility of agencies, often governmental, in preventing the intentional misuse of microorganisms. Hence, the term can easily inspire considerations beyond science.

02:24

Coronavirus: A look inside China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology

Coronavirus: A look inside China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology

The full name of the document Chinese diplomats put forward is the “Tianjin Biosecurity Guidelines for Codes of Conduct for Scientists”. It has benefited from scientific collaboration between Tianjin University and the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, dating back to 2012. That intra-academy partnership enjoyed support from the US Department of State and China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x