Editorial | Success of Article 23 security law rests on full public consultation
- Hong Kong authorities have a constitutional duty to pass the legislation and there is sufficient time to engage citizens in order to address their concerns

Article 23 stipulates Hong Kong shall enact laws in seven areas, including treason, secession, sedition, subversion, theft of state secrets, foreign political organisations conducting political activities in the city as well as local groups establishing ties with foreign political bodies. Separately, the national security law targets four major offences, namely subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with external forces.
Whether the 2003 blueprint will be dusted off for use remains to be seen. But Tang has already warned that it will require heavy editing to address the situation following the social unrest of 2019. He highlighted the need to target foreign“state-level organisations” behind what he described as a “colour revolution”, saying the current law does not regulate such activities.
The Basic Law gives the city a constitutional duty to protect national security. How this will be tackled in the Article 23 legislation will be of serious concern to both local and foreign communities. Unlike the law imposed by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee last year, Article 23 legislation will be enacted by the city government on its own. This should provide ample opportunity for proper public engagement, in particular with stakeholders. The undertaking that the legislation will be passed after such consultation during the next term of the Legislative Council can help address any concerns that may arise. It is in the city’s best interests to get the right law in place this time.
