Editorial | World peace requires dialogue rather than a hypersonic arms race
- The dispute between nations is political and that requires regulation of behaviour, not military provocation

The rivalry between the US and China is driving development of sophisticated weapons systems that show prowess and strength. Nuclear submarines can stay under water for longer and manoeuvre more stealthily than conventionally powered counterparts. For one to have been in the contested waters of the South China Sea, where Washington is trying to push back against Chinese sovereignty claims in the name of “freedom of passage”, is not surprising given its regular sailing of warships through the area. For an accident to have occurred, but not reveal it happened for six days and to give scant information, as was the case with the USS Connecticut, is disturbing.
All the US Navy announced was that 11 sailors were injured when the submarine hit a mystery object in the South China Sea on October 2. It claimed the nuclear propulsion system was not damaged and the vessel returned to the US naval base at Guam for checks. The sea is criss-crossed with underwater communications cables, littered with sunken boats and containers and busy with shipping; dangerous conditions for large submarines and especially so when an accident could cause a leak of nuclear fuel. Such worries are the reason Australia’s acquiring of nuclear submarines in a partnership with the US and Britain has sparked concern in the region.
An arms race is not what the world needs between the US and China and their allies; it only increases the risk of conflict. The dispute between the nations is political and that requires regulation of behaviour and dialogue, not military provocation.
