Opinion | Rich countries are pledging funds to help poorer nations fight climate change, but does foreign aid actually work?
- Developing countries will suffer disproportionately from the effects of climate change, but have been promised only half the funds the UN says are needed for them to adapt
- Yet, even when money is granted, failed initiatives show that it does not always solve problems

There are no global courts or mechanisms to enforce these pledges, only the crumbling pillars of goodwill. Rich nations will have to spend their sparse commitments wisely if they want them to amount to anything more than another box-ticking exercise.
A fragmented, “siloed” approach to foreign aid does not work. Having one programme for food, another for water and another for education usually means problems go unsolved. Instead, we need a holistic, all-encompassing approach that actually promotes development.
The Gyandoot programme in India is a perfect example of a failed initiative. It provided computer kiosks in rural areas, yet the lack of electricity and connectivity meant that only a few proved commercially viable.
The computers were left to fall into disrepair, and today they are nothing but a symbol of international incompetence. This illustrates the flaws of a siloed approach; it fails to see the forest for the trees.

