Opinion | West must ultimately take blame for failing to preserve peace in Europe
- Russia may have begun the invasion of Ukraine, but it is the US and Nato’s long history of expansionism and desire for global dominance that brought war to Europe
- Even now, when pursuing a path of multipolar coexistence might restore peace, the West instead allows Ukraine to pay the price for its aggression
Europe has largely been at peace since the end of World War II. The Soviet invasions of Hungary in 1956 and of Czechoslovakia in 1968 were exceptions, but they were localised attempts to keep the Soviet bloc intact rather than intrusions into the Western sphere. The Russo-Georgian war of 2008, meanwhile, has echoes in the current conflict.
Truly dreadful were the Balkan wars that followed the destruction of the Soviet Union, which saw the break-up of Yugoslavia and resulted in war crimes ranging from genocide and crimes against humanity to ethnic cleansing and rape. Even so, as a whole, Pax Europaea – the European peace – has prevailed.
That peace came to an end in February with the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It had been preceded by the 2014 Russian annexation of the Crimean peninsula. This time, though, Russia’s war aims go beyond protecting the independence of the Donbas region to include Ukraine’s neutrality between Russia and the West, its abstention from joining Nato, and its refusal to become a nuclear power or allow foreign military bases on its territory. Should these demands be met, they would represent the most fundamental realignment in European affairs since the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
They would occur against the backdrop of a punitive war. No matter who wins or claims to have won this war, European peace has been shattered. While Russia holds blame for having launched the invasion, the West must stand accused of having lost the peace that existed before Russia’s “special military operation” began on February 24.
Why should the West be held culpable along with Russia? It is because European peace would have prevailed had not Nato’s eastward expansion of its nuclear infrastructure threatened Russian security.
It was an expansive West, bent on exporting its self-serving ideology of freedom and democracy through overt and covert support for popular uprisings against regimes that it considered to be unfriendly, that created the political encirclement of Russia – a country that has never sought to export its autocratic model of governance to the West.