Advertisement
Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF)
Opinion
Editorial
SCMP Editorial

Abolish MPF raids by Hong Kong bosses immediately

  • Despite years of talk to end the practice, employers continue to dip into the pension savings of workers who need them most

2-MIN READ2-MIN
1
Employers have a social responsibility to contribute to Hong Kong workers’ security in retirement. Photo: Bloomberg
Editorials represent the views of the South China Morning Post on the issues of the day.

Previous Hong Kong chief executive Leung Chun-ying lamented before he left office in 2017 that he had not fulfilled his election promise to abolish a controversial Mandatory Provident Fund provision that allows bosses to claw back their contributions to workers’ pension funds to cover severance and long-service payments.

Five years later, his successor, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, finds herself in a similar position with less than two months left in office, thanks to continued employer resistance to giving up an anomalous right.

This is despite the government having raised the subsidies offered to bosses for their support in phasing out the so-called offsetting MPF mechanism from HK$7.9 billion (US$1 billion) over 10 years proposed by Leung to HK$32.9 billion over 25 years in a bill now stalled in the Legislative Council.

Advertisement

Close to 90 per cent of Hong Kong’s 340,000 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) would stand to benefit. It may be worth it now, but this is a questionable use of taxpayers’ funds to get rid of something that should never have been agreed to in the first place, on grounds of social equity.

The mechanism should be abolished immediately. There should have been no need for Lam to appeal to pro-establishment lawmakers to pass the bill.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x