China can safely exit zero-Covid by giving local cadres the right incentive
- To accomplish the mammoth task of vaccinating its unvaccinated and undervaccinated population, Beijing needs to suitably loosen the reins and encourage local policy innovation
- It could replace GDP growth with vaccination targets as a key measure of local cadre performance
How China’s exit from zero-Covid is likely to play out must be understood in the framework of its decentralised governance under centralised political control.
Regional decentralisation, particularly for economic matters, has been fundamental to China’s governance, particularly since economic reforms began. This has provided incentives and flexibility in the economic adaptation and development that drove China’s growth.
Another outcome of China’s decentralisation is the minimisation of bad news that has to be broken to the higher-ups, a practice which may lead to manipulation or fabrication. Back in early 2020, as Covid-19 spread in a Wuhan that was in the midst of the local and provincial “two sessions”, the motivation was to control the problem locally rather than report it transparently.
The all-consuming tasks of mass testing and lockdowns also distracted local governments from the more important work of vaccinating the elderly and upgrading medical facilities. Without a clear mandate from the central government, local governments were also risk-adverse in pushing vaccine mandates.
Zero-Covid’s end brings a difficult transition to living with the virus
Among those aged 80 and above in China, 66 per cent have been administered two doses while only 40 per cent have received booster shots. The top priority is perhaps to give a third dose to the double-jabbed.
Here, the greatest challenge is to overcome the resistance among the 23.4 per cent of the over-80s who have yet to receive any vaccination. These 8 million unvaccinated seniors have effectively been holding the entire population of 1.4 billion hostage. Beijing aims to bring 23.4 per cent to below 10 per cent by the end of January.
However, such lofty vaccination goals will not be reached unless local governments are incentivised the right way.
First, there should be targets of three-dose vaccination rates by Lunar New Year: say, 60 per cent for the over-80s and 80 per cent for the general population. In addition, a minimum level for administering the first shot to the over-80s could be set, at 80 per cent, for example – just a little higher than the current rate of 76.6 per cent. These realistic targets, representing a floor, are political goals that must be strictly implemented.
The regions which fall far below the national averages may be given a bit more time to catch up, but they should be placed by on a watch list for swift rectification.
Instead of gross domestic product growth, Beijing can make three-dose vaccination rates a key measure of cadre performance until 2023. In fact, this should be seen as a leading indicator of economic growth, as a high three-dose vaccination rates will provide a solid foundation for China’s economic reopening.
In addition to quantitative measures, Beijing could recognise and reward local cadres for successful policy innovations in increasing vaccination, particularly among the elderly.
Local attempts to push vaccine mandates were sometimes stopped for fear of social resistance. Instead, Beijing should consider building on the success of local experiments and rolling out a proven scheme on a national scale next year.
As China continues to ease Covid-19 restrictions, infections are likely to surge early next year. The time window to protect the elderly is tight. Beijing must effectively mobilise all levels of administrative hierarchy to swiftly maximise vaccination and rejuvenate the economy.
Winston Mok, a private investor, was previously a private equity investor