A woman shouts anti-government slogans during a protest in Buenos Aires, Argentina, against the government’s agreement with the International Monetary Fund to refinance some US$45 billion in debt, on March 10, 2022. Photo: AP
This year may prove devastating for the developing world, as more countries find themselves engulfed in debt crises. Several are already in default, and scores of others urgently need debt relief to ward off economic collapse and sharp rises in poverty.
The prevailing response to debt crises is to negotiate complex packages involving the debtor country, international financial institutions (IFIs), and other external creditors. Domestic bondholders, labour unions and others play a part too.

The bargaining process can be lengthy and feature significant domestic and global efforts to game the outcome by pushing a larger burden of losses onto others, even as debtor-country conditions deteriorate.

The rise of emerging markets as major bilateral official creditors has added complexity to an already difficult process. China, India, countries in the Middle East, and others have not been part of conventional debt-resolution arrangements.

The key to making debt deals more compelling to all is to design them in a way that unlocks growth opportunities. The prospect of large-enough gains would attract all parties to the negotiating table.

Growth-promoting debt resolution requires a three-sided deal. Debtor governments can afford to invest in growth opportunities and cut unproductive and inefficient expenditures only if additional resources are provided. The IFIs can safely lend those resources only if the existing creditors agree to debt (and debt-service) reduction.

The existing creditors, in turn, will provide debt relief only if the IFIs can apply effective conditionality to ensure that debtor governments maintain appropriate growth policies. With a new wave of debt workouts looming, some of the elements of such grand deals must be updated and adapted to new global realities.


IMF agrees to bail Sri Lanka out with US$2.9 billion conditional package

IMF agrees to bail Sri Lanka out with US$2.9 billion conditional package
One key issue has to do with the nature of growth opportunities. Developments such as deglobalisation, decarbonisation efforts and the demise of the export-oriented growth model are likely to have lowered the growth potential of low-income countries.

This implies that debt-reduction bargains should not exaggerate the role of future growth and that the cost of lost growth opportunities will have to be deeper debt reductions. But future growth would be even lower in the absence of new investments that adjust the growth path to new realities.

If new growth opportunities receive new financing and are profitable, they can lessen the need for debt reduction, by partly counteracting the effect of the trade-related decline in growth opportunities. These opportunities and funding needs are clearest with respect to the green transition.

Hong Kong is ‘Asia’s sustainable finance centre’, financiers say

Climate change is hurting growth prospects in low-income countries the most, owing partly to their geographical location and partly to their populations’ greater vulnerability and inability to mitigate climate risks. Green growth is largely about implementing public policies to offset these negative forces. But it is also about taking advantage of new opportunities.
Investments in adaptation to climate change include projects to defend against sea-level rises, reduce the salinity of floods, bolster road and bridge infrastructure, and increase water conservation. Since global food prices are expected to vary more widely in the coming years, adaptation also includes improving food security. Mitigation will focus on generating power in clean ways, using solar and wind technologies that require front-loaded investments.


Pakistan floods are ‘climate carnage’, says UN chief Guterres

Pakistan floods are ‘climate carnage’, says UN chief Guterres

For this to happen, IFIs’ approach must change. Conditionality must be adapted to the new development challenges. It must embrace the new growth agenda and shift its focus from an overemphasis on macroeconomic targets to socially acceptable policies that support the green growth imperative. Since the growth payoffs are likely to take longer, conditionality must be phased in accordingly.

Moreover, IFIs must take on a larger financing role, both directly and through efforts to leverage private finance through enhancements. IFIs will need to provide new finance early on, until debtor countries re-establish a track record of creditworthiness and market access.

Multilateral development banks can lead battle against economic turbulence

Given valuable growth opportunities, the size of IFI loans and the amount of debt reduction needed can be negatively correlated. An ambitious lending programme that financed an ambitious reform programme should lead to high growth rates and thus require less debt reduction.

Finally, IFIs need to respond to the changes in creditor composition. Burden-sharing is more complex today, owing to the growth of private-market debt and the rise of new creditors. If the new official creditors are going to be taking major losses on their claims, they might expect to have a greater say in how the principles for debt restructuring are developed.

People gather in the impoverished neighbourhood of Bab al-Tabbaneh, in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli, on January 17, 2022. Lebanon is one of several countries that has defaulted on its debt during the pandemic years. Photo: AFP

In the short term, the principles must be applied in flexible ways to facilitate progress. Over time, the significant changes in the official creditor landscape must be reflected in the composition of IFI boards.

Economic growth remains an essential ingredient of successful debt deals. But even in the best of circumstances, developing countries’ growth is likely to be slower and more domestically oriented, requiring a combination of deeper debt reduction and longer time horizons.

Realising new investment opportunities will require new funding and new forms of conditionality. And new financing will have to come early and largely from IFIs, until developing countries embark credibly on new growth paths.

Dani Rodrik, professor of international political economy at Harvard Kennedy School, is president of the International Economic Association and the author of Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy

Reza Baqir, a former governor of the State Bank of Pakistan, is a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government

Ishac Diwan is research director at the Finance for Development Lab. Copyright: Project Syndicate