A transparent inquiry into Covid can help reassure the public
- With more than 13,000 people having died of the disease in Hong Kong, the city deserves an open probe into its spread, rather than a closed-door review
Hong Kong’s struggle with Covid-19 was often described as a war. As normal life gradually returns, it appears the battle, at least, has been won. But the city still needs a better understanding of those three traumatic years. There were many casualties. The death toll now exceeds 13,000, a level that would have been considered unthinkable at the beginning of the pandemic. The community has been deeply affected by prolonged border closures and strict social-distancing rules. Many questions still need to be answered. Chief among them is why Hong Kong was so unprepared for the “fifth wave” of cases early last year, when health services were engulfed.
Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said he disagreed with those calling for an independent probe into the handling of the pandemic, referring specifically to a commission of inquiry. Lee pointed out that the government constantly reviewed and adapted its approach. He highlighted measures introduced since he took office in July, to improve decision-making and provide a more cohesive response. But that review process takes place behind closed doors. The public is not privy to the discussions. An independent inquiry would provide this. At the very least, details of any internal review should be made public.
Hong Kong leader dismisses calls for independent review of pandemic handling
There is a need for objectivity. It is not about targeting officials, but identifying mistakes and improving the city’s ability to respond to health threats. Investigations may take many forms. The government rejected calls for a commission of inquiry into the severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) outbreak in 2003, which claimed 299 lives. But it quickly established a panel of international experts to investigate the city’s handling of it. They made 46 recommendations, including setting up the Centre for Health Protection. This was not sufficient to meet public concerns at the time. The expert panel was considered by some to lack independence. The Legislative Council, therefore, conducted an inquiry the following year that focused more on the conduct of officials.
The government is, understandably, making an economic recovery its priority. But an impartial, independent inquiry into the pandemic is needed. Whatever form that takes, transparency is the key. Lee should be aware that an internal review might not be perceived as sufficiently independent. There is a need to convince the public that lessons have been learned.
Covid-19 and the response to it have had a dramatic impact on people’s lives. Thousands are grieving for lost loved ones. Many more are still recovering from the impact of anti-Covid measures on their daily lives. A review would help Hong Kong people come to terms with the difficult times they have experienced. It would clear up uncertainties and ensure the city is better prepared for the future.
