Advertisement

My Take | It is time for action to protect the rights of Hong Kong’s LGBTQ community

  • Ten years separates two court rulings hailed as breakthroughs for the transgender community. But government has done little in that decade

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
2
Henry Edward Tse meets the media outside the Court of Final Appeal after the court handed down a landmark ruling finding that authorities’ refusal to allow two transgender people to use their preferred gender on their identity cards without undergoing full reassignment surgery had breached their rights.  Photo: SCMP/Edmond So

Ten years ago, a judgment by Hong Kong’s top court was hailed as a breakthrough for the city’s transgender community. Last week, another landmark ruling was rightly heralded in similar terms. But little has been done in between the two decisions to safeguard the rights of the LGBTQ community, despite growing support among the general public and advances around the world.

The courts have, at times, struck out discriminatory practices. But successive administrations have dragged their feet. The lack of progress undermines Hong Kong’s claim to be inclusive and diverse.

In 2013, top judges ruled a transgender woman could marry her boyfriend. They said legislation was needed to clarify the law for transgender people in areas such as parenting, benefits, pensions, sport and discrimination. The government responded by permitting transgender people to marry, but only if they have had “sex reassignment surgery”, involving the removal and reconstruction of their genitals.

Advertisement

A working group was set up in 2014 to make recommendations on all legal areas concerning transsexuals. There was a consultation in 2017 on establishing a gender recognition scheme. Further research, reports and legislation were expected. But little, if anything, has happened. The latest “news” on the group’s website relates to the 2017 consultation. Meanwhile, the increasing number of transgender people in the city are left facing discrimination and embarrassment as they strive to live their lives with dignity.

Tse and “Q”, represented by King’s Counsel David Pannick, won their bid to scrap full sexual ressignment surgery as a prerequisite to changing their gender on their identity cards. Photo: SCMP/ Chris Lau
Tse and “Q”, represented by King’s Counsel David Pannick, won their bid to scrap full sexual ressignment surgery as a prerequisite to changing their gender on their identity cards. Photo: SCMP/ Chris Lau

The latest case was brought by two transgender men. They were born female but, from an early age, identified as male. Both suffered gender dysphoria, a medical condition causing distress and discomfort. They were effectively trapped in the wrong gender. Each endured lengthy medical procedures, including hormone treatment and the removal of their breasts. They have the appearance of men and have lived their life as men for years. They did not have full reassignment surgery because it was unnecessary and can be painful, risky and lead to complications.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x