Amid US-China decoupling rhetoric and diversifying supply chains, reducing risk is a top priority for business
- Businesses are diversifying into previously overlooked parts of the world, but those unchartered waters require heightened risk management
- Firms of all sizes, as well as states, want an effective avenue of recourse and thus turn to international arbitration to resolve conflicts
Although the rhetoric of decoupling between the United States and China has intensified, trade flows hit an all-time record of US$690.6 billion in 2022. The two nations are connected by larger trade flows than any other pair of countries without a common border.
But, both have significantly reduced the share of imports coming from each other, according to DHL’s Global Connectedness Index. In 2022, the share of imported Chinese goods as a percentage of total US imports fell to 16.6 per cent, down from 21.6 per cent in 2017. The value of US goods exported to China in 2022 as a percentage of total US exports fell to 7.3 per cent, down from 8.4 per cent in 2017.
China’s loss is Southeast Asia’s gain as supply chains shift
Key to risk mitigation is ensuring that cross-border agreements have an effective dispute resolution mechanism. Businesses trading across borders do not want to find themselves in the courts of their counterparties. The process is often too slow, hard to navigate or untrustworthy.
Firms value the confidentiality and procedural flexibility of arbitration proceedings, including the opportunity to have a say in the composition of the arbitral tribunal. Another significant benefit is the ease of enforcing arbitration awards under the New York Convention, signed by more than 170 countries, including China and the US.
Unlike litigation, arbitration is a consensual process. It is therefore critical that a company engaged in cross-border business carefully considers the arbitration clause to ensure the process meets its needs if a dispute arises.
A poorly drafted dispute resolution clause risks significant costs and delay. An obstructive counterparty is likely to exploit gaps or ambiguities, giving rise to “satellite” litigation that can derail and delay any claim.
Parties from almost 150 countries trust ICC arbitration to resolve their disputes, with 25 per cent of the parties coming from the Asia-Pacific region.
Asian parties are also increasingly turning to mediation and other procedures to reach an amicable resolution of their dispute when the fast-paced business landscape leaves no room for litigation or arbitration.
Expert determination is an efficient method for resolving technical disputes that could disrupt business operations. Likewise, dispute boards can help parties catch and address disputes in the early stages to avoid escalation.
With rising geopolitical tensions, businesses will diversify into previously overlooked parts of the world to build more resilient supply chains and expand into new markets, but those unchartered waters require heightened risk management and mitigation.
Arbitration, mediation, expert determination and dispute boards are essential tools every business needs to consider – before the dispute arises – to assure they have the dispute resolution process that meets their needs and helps them get back to business.
Claudia Salomon is president of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, which is holding its Asia-Pacific Conference on International Arbitration in Hong Kong on June 26-27, celebrating the centenary of the ICC Court and the 15th anniversary of the ICC case management team in Hong Kong