Opinion | How will Nato’s stress on global security play out in Asia?
- ‘Security is global’ was the oft-repeated mantra at the Nato summit in Vilnius, although Ukraine understandably garnered much attention
- While a liaison office in Japan was not mentioned in the communique, an individually tailored partnership was firmed up, and similar agreements could follow with other countries in the Indo-Pacific region

First, there was its unwavering support for Ukraine. At the Vilnius summit, a package of commitments was agreed on to reinforce Ukraine’s progress towards Nato membership. This includes a multi-year assistance programme to help Ukrainian forces transition to meet Nato operational standards, the establishment of a Nato-Ukraine Council to strengthen political ties and the decision to drop the requirement for a membership action plan, which is a path of reforms ahead of joining the alliance.
Refraining from making concrete pledges in Vilnius, the alliance instead stated that it would “be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the alliance when allies agree and conditions are met”. This brought to mind the failed commitments made at the Bucharest summit in 2008. Still, a positive, unified message was sent to Kyiv at Vilnius, expressing commitment to deepening the relationship and providing support.

As security threats and challenges have profoundly changed in recent years, Nato has followed up on its Madrid strategic concept by developing new, comprehensive defence plans. These plans emphasise joint procurement, interoperability, command structure, defence investments, production capacity and industrial innovation. Of particular importance is the concrete commitment to achieve a minimum of 2 per cent of gross domestic product for defence spending among Nato allies.
