Advertisement
Climate change
Opinion
Lawrence H. SummersandN.K. Singh

The View | Multilateral development banks must evolve to meet urgent need for climate finance and fund other public goods

  • These banks are the only institutions that provide the combination of expertise, staying power, low-cost financing, leverage and knowledge-sharing capabilities needed to assist developing countries. But to help transform these countries’ future, these banks must first transform themselves

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Multilateral development banks such as the World Bank have failed to keep pace with the changing needs of developing countries. They could as a start embrace a triple mandate by adding global public goods to their current goals of eliminating extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity. Photo: Reuters
The world is on fire this summer. Experts estimate that another Covid-level public health threat is likely to emerge in the next generation. Rising interest rates have left dozens of countries with unmanageable debt burdens. And for the first time in nearly half a century, the global economy is fracturing rather than coming together.
These realities shaped the recommendations that we have just made to the Group of 20 through a special expert group on development financing, which we co-chair. Our central conclusion is that this uniquely challenging moment requires a dramatic transformation of the operations of the multilateral development banks, starting with the World Bank.
Even as developing countries face much larger financing needs to meet development and climate goals, multilateral development banks’ disbursements have not kept pace. The degree to which they now transfer resources to developing countries is unacceptably low.
Advertisement

While most institutions, most of the time, aim for a gradual strengthening of their scale and effectiveness, multilateral development banks have been stuck in place. We must move past sterile debates about whether we need more money or better policy, more green initiatives or more development spending, more public-sector programmes or more private lending, more leverage or more capital. The language of “both/and” must replace that of “either/or.” To that end, we are calling for action on three fronts.

First, multilateral development banks should embrace a triple mandate by adding global public goods to their current goals of eliminating extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity. That will mean fleshing out the policies and procedures needed to integrate their climate and development agendas.

Advertisement
By clarifying and formally committing to these objectives, these banks can better design and execute programmes to address global public goods – such as climate mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, water security and pandemic preparedness – rapidly and at scale.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x