Advertisement
Advertisement
An employee works at Shougang Jingtang United Iron & Steel’s warehouse in Tangshan, Hebei province, on July 22. For carmakers, the first step to reducing their steel-related emissions is to disclose them. Photo: Xinhua
Opinion
Wenjie Liu
Wenjie Liu

Carmakers must steel themselves to address carbon emissions in supply chains

  • Carmakers are focusing on electrification, but new climate legislation will make procurement of low-carbon steel a point of competition
  • Traditional carmakers should lay out ambitious steel decarbonisation targets now, along with their electrification road maps, or risk losing out once again
In the automotive sector, the race to electrification is shifting into high gear. All-electric carmakers like Tesla and BYD are smashing sales records, leaving traditional carmakers struggling to keep up.
But electrification is just one aspect of auto sector emissions reduction. Of critical importance, but often overlooked, is the urgent need for carmakers to address carbon emissions in their supply chains, particularly from the use of steel.

The auto industry’s carbon emissions from steel are extremely high – we estimate that they rival those of the entire country of Australia. On average, steel contributes 30 to 40 per cent of a vehicle’s material emissions. With the transition to battery electric vehicles, the portion of steel in auto emissions is growing. By 2040, materials are on track to account for 60 per cent of automotive life-cycle emissions, according to a McKinsey analysis.

As new climate legislation goes into force, procurement of low-carbon steel is on track to become a point of competition between carmakers. The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which takes full effect in January 2026, will impose taxes on imports of steel and other high-carbon materials based on the volume of emissions from production. If steelmakers fail to decarbonise, they will face a steep disadvantage in the EU market.

In East Asia, which is home to 60 per cent of global crude steel production, the impact of CBAM will be especially pronounced. Analysts have forecast that CBAM-related tariffs on steel exports from China could reach over US$350 million, and tariffs on steel exports from South Korea could be nearly US$200 million.

In the future, carmakers and other downstream producers are likely to seek out steel suppliers with lower carbon intensity to avoid sky-high tariffs.

03:31

Chinese-owned steel mill rains ‘thick, greasy’ dust on Serbian town facing rising cancer cases

Chinese-owned steel mill rains ‘thick, greasy’ dust on Serbian town facing rising cancer cases

However, carmakers have yet to take even the most basic step towards reducing their emissions from steel: disclosure. In our recent study of 16 major carmakers, not a single one had published its emissions specifically associated with steel. In addition, no carmaker included in our study had set a distinct target for steel decarbonisation.

In certain cases, carmakers and steelmakers have established low-carbon steel partnerships, but the effectiveness of these projects has been limited. To date, such partnerships have either been very small in scale or are still in the development stage.

For example, three European steel manufacturers – H2 Green Steel, SSAB, and Salzgitter – are currently testing green hydrogen steel production processes. However, the steelmakers are not on track to sell green hydrogen steel on a commercial scale until at least 2025.

In Japan, Toyota and Nissan claim to or plan to use low-carbon steel for select vehicles, but the scope is so small that it has little impact on the carmakers’ emissions from steel.

From a climate perspective, the need to reduce emissions from steel is urgent. The iron and steel industry currently accounts for 11 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions and is a significant source of toxic air pollution. To align with global climate commitments, we estimate that carmakers must more than halve their emissions from steel by 2030.

Although the reduction of steel emissions is a daunting task, carmakers can take a series of clear steps to work in this direction.

First, carmakers must disclose their steel-related emissions. Next, they should issue public commitments to procure low-carbon steel. Clear targets would send a strong signal to steelmakers of the need to decarbonise.

Finally, carmakers must target net zero emissions across their supply chains, via both decreased steel usage and full adoption of low-carbon steel.

01:08

China’s largest shipment of electric vehicles sets sail from Shanghai port

China’s largest shipment of electric vehicles sets sail from Shanghai port
Moreover, substantial public and private investment is necessary to advance the development of low-carbon steel. In East Asia, governments have granted significant financial support to the steel industry, especially for hydrogen production and via electric vehicle subsidies. Likewise, sustainability-linked loans, transition bonds and other financial instruments could mobilise resources for steel decarbonisation.
Traditional carmakers like Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai already face business challenges due to their slow transition to electric vehicles. In the coming years, they will also encounter mounting pressure to decarbonise their steel supply chains.

It would be prudent for these carmakers to lay out ambitious steel decarbonisation targets now, alongside their electrification road maps, before they once again find themselves falling behind in the race.

Wenjie Liu is a senior analyst at Greenpeace East Asia. She is based in Tokyo

2