-
Advertisement
United States
Opinion
Robert Delaney

On Balance | Trump still owns the Republican Party, but Elise Stefanik waits in the wings

  • The Republican congresswoman’s sparring with the heads of Ivy League universities has gone viral, establishing her ability to rouse moderates
  • She is an obvious contender for the White House whenever she decides it’s time to run

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
3
US Representative Elise Stefanik speaks to the media after the Republican caucus meeting, in Washington on May 14, 2021. Photo: Reuters
The future of the US Republican Party isn’t Donald Trump, Nikki Haley or Ron DeSantis. It’s Elise Stefanik, who put her abilities on full display at a congressional hearing last week.

With her final line of questioning on genocide, a subject that US politicians of all stripes invoke in their allegations against Beijing, the New York representative pulled off a spectacle with more substance than the usual performative garbage masquerading as debate.

Her exchanges with the University of Pennsylvania’s then president Elizabeth Magill, MIT president Sally Kornbluth and Harvard University president Claudine Gay – who were inexplicably incapable of saying that calls for genocide against Jews are against their schools’ codes of conduct – have dominated the headlines and social media since.

Advertisement
They provided rocket fuel for the Republican Party’s charge against “woke” elitism in American academia, the same territory that many in the party target for exchanges with China. Magill resigned. The hearing was parodied on Saturday Night Live. Investigations will ensue.

In the tragic politics of the Middle East, where dislocation, dispossession and violent hatred make choosing sides treacherous, Stefanik’s question should have been easy to answer.

02:40

Gaza residents gather around a massive crater ahead of pause in war with Israel

Gaza residents gather around a massive crater ahead of pause in war with Israel

The rules of engagement in academic discourse are complex, but there was an obvious rhetorical path: calls for genocide have no place in civilised culture, including academia, and such speech differs fundamentally from denunciations of the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians, which should be acceptable within discourse about the Middle East.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x