Editorial | Balance the legitimate needs of media and privacy of individuals
- A clearer avenue is needed for Hong Kong journalists seeking details of vehicle owners via the Transport Department’s database, as long as it is in the public interest

The prosecution of journalist Bao Choy Yuk-ling, who was fined in 2021 for her use of a government database, raised concerns within the city’s media community about legal risks faced by reporters.
Choy conducted what was considered at the time to be a routine search for details of a vehicle owner on the Transport Department’s website.
She was conducting research for an RTHK documentary about a mob attack on protesters during civil unrest in 2019.
The journalist was accused of making false statements by ticking a box declaring the purpose of her application to be “other traffic and transport related matters”. There was no box for journalism.
Choy’s conviction was overturned by the Court of Final Appeal last year. The judges found serious journalism to fall within the “other matters” category and said she had suffered an injustice.
The ruling offered reassurance to journalists. But it also highlighted a need for greater clarity, which the government promised to provide.
