By ditching coal for biomass, Japan and South Korea are embracing false hope of a zero-carbon future
- Burning wood pellets to generate power is often not carbon neutral and can be more polluting than coal
- By funding biomass instead of wind and solar, governments will undermine their net zero goals, waste taxpayer’s money and add to deforestation
Last year, my colleagues and I [Tomos] took a close look at Britain’s biggest greenhouse gas emitter. It’s not a coal plant – at least not any more, really.
These subsidies are provided under the premise that burning biomass is carbon neutral, that all the carbon released from burning trees is reabsorbed when new trees are grown. This logic is no longer supported by the latest scientific evidence, which shows that burning wood for power is often not carbon neutral, and can be more polluting than coal.
Yet, surprisingly, most people, including many policymakers, did not realise how dirty this energy could be, and were shocked to learn just how much money meant to reduce carbon emissions was being used to pump them up.
Now, this same faulty logic is spreading across Asia, as countries such as South Korea and Japan see biomass as a “clean” replacement to coal power.
Over the past decade, biomass imports have boomed in South Korea; it now imports close to 3 million tonnes of wood pellets each year, largely derived from forests across Southeast Asia. In 2020, close to 2 million tonnes came from Vietnam alone, with Malaysia and Indonesia contributing over 500,000 and 300,000 tonnes respectively.
In 2020, Vietnam also became the leading exporter of wood pellets to Japan, which has the fastest-growing industrial biomass market globally, importing over 2 million tonnes each year.
Like Britain back in 2012, Japan sees biomass as an alternative to coal power. The same company that runs the Drax plant in Britain has just set up a new office in Tokyo. Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is discussing whether biomass should be used to extend the lifespan of some of its least-efficient coal plants, by mixing coal with biomass in a process called co-firing.
Climate change: hastening Asia’s shift to green energy will not be easy
Doing so would have the same dismal results as admitted by British government ministers, who now recognise that we have wasted too much time and money on this failed experiment.
The Japanese government would only end up undermining its net zero commitments and wasting millions of taxpayer dollars to increase carbon emissions, while undercutting the country’s wind and solar industries.
Tomos Harrison is an electricity transition analyst at Ember, Europe. Dr Evan Gach is programme coordinator at Kiko Network, Japan