China needs it, the US has it, but why might a trade war energy deal not be the easy win it appears to be?
- The US will soon be a net exporter of energy, while China is the world’s biggest importer, suggesting energy would be low-hanging fruit in a trade war deal
- However, issues over energy security and market access complicate the dynamic, with China keen to maintain control over its domestic market

In the second in a series on the trade war, we look at why China’s need for energy security makes a deal with the US on energy more complicated than it may seem.
These simple facts have led many to suggest that a deal on energy trade would be low-hanging fruit in otherwise testing negotiations to strike a wider accord to end the trade war. But, as has been the case with many elements of the prolonged trade talks, things are not as simple as they seem.
While both nations were highly dependent on foreign energy a decade ago, their fortunes have since diverged markedly.

Advancements in drilling technology allowed the US to tap previously inaccessible shale rock formations, which saw its high dependence on foreign petroleum drop to near self-sufficiency over the past decade.
The US has subsequently enjoyed an energy boom, thanks largely to these huge stores of shale oil and gas. So vast are the discoveries, according to International Energy Agency forecasts, that the US may surpass Russia and Saudi Arabia as the largest crude oil exporter by 2024.