-
Advertisement
Art
LifestyleArts

Rembrandt painting rejected as not by him in 1960 now confirmed as the Dutch master’s work

After years of scrutiny, ‘Vision of Zacharias in the Temple’ has been confirmed to be a Rembrandt by the Netherlands’ Rijksmuseum

2-MIN READ2-MIN
1
Listen
“Vision of Zacharias in the Temple”, confirmed by Dutch researchers as a 1633 original work by Rembrandt, is displayed at the Rijksmuseum Atelier in Amsterdam on March 2, 2026. Photo: Reuters
Associated Press

A painting that was once rejected as a work by Rembrandt van Rijn has now been acknowledged as a work by the Dutch master, thanks to two years of scrutiny in the city where the then 27-year-old artist painted it in 1633, a museum announced on Monday.

The Netherlands’ national art and history museum, the Rijksmuseum, unveiled the work, Vision of Zacharias in the Temple, and said painstaking analysis, including hi-tech scans, has confirmed it was painted by Rembrandt after he moved to the Dutch capital, Amsterdam.

The painting has not been on public display in decades after being bought by a private collector in 1961, a year after it was deemed not to be a Rembrandt, the museum said in a statement. From Wednesday, it will go on show among other masterpieces at the Rijksmuseum, where it is on long-term loan.
Advertisement

Director Taco Dibbits said the museum often gets emails from people asking if the painting they own might just be by the Dutch Golden Age master.

“We always hope to find a new Rembrandt, but this happens rarely,” he said, adding that making such a discovery “is just like [finding] a needle in a haystack”.

Taco Dibbits, the general director of the Rijksmuseum, unveiled the work “Vision of Zacharias in the Temple” during a press preview in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, on March 2, 2026. Photo: AP
Taco Dibbits, the general director of the Rijksmuseum, unveiled the work “Vision of Zacharias in the Temple” during a press preview in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, on March 2, 2026. Photo: AP

The owner, who has remained anonymous, initially asked the museum only if the painting was Dutch.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x