When too much news is bad news
Last week The Philosophers' Mail proclaimed, under its masthead: "We're a news organisation with a passionate belief that too much news is bad for you."

by Alain De Botton
Pantheon Books
2.5 stars
Ben Richardson
Last week The Philosophers' Mail proclaimed, under its masthead: "We're a news organisation with a passionate belief that too much news is bad for you."
Noodling through other editions of the online newspaper, you can find an interview with David Beckham's soul, an article on Tamara Ecclestone, daughter of the Formula One supremo, Bernie, as a test case for capitalism, and a photo of One Direction heartthrob Harry Styles at the Mail's recent launch party with Alain De Botton, master of philosophical whimsy and brains behind the only global news outlet manned entirely by philosophers.
"There's something appealing in the idea that Styles does not just sing nice songs, but is also increasingly interested in philosophy," the newspaper says. "Celebrities are hugely powerful agents for getting us interested in things."
Why should they be the preserve of news organisations that use fame and sex to peddle dystopia? Why not use them to make the world a better place? "As revolutionaries well know, if you want to change the mentality of a country," De Botton writes in The News: A User's Manual, "you drive the tanks straight to the nerve centre of the body politic, the news HQ."
He has a point. Deng Xiaoping, as editor, rattled off 28 editions of Red Star, the party's mouthpiece, on the 10,000-kilometre Long March. The fear of words embedded with thoughts they can't control has tormented our leaders ever since.